The Social Democrats are the masters of the power economy. From this perspective, they developed a nine-euro ticket. Because it will soon provide success stories. Quite simply: because it offers an expensive good through extensive use of taxes on terms that the market cannot offer because the costs do not need to be refinanced.
The €9 ticket is available for three months: from June to August. Anyone who buys it full time pays 27 euros. The cost of one trip from Saarbrücken to Frankfurt am Main is 42 euros. Second row. in regional traffic. In the cities, short-distance tickets for buses and trams already cost 2 euros. Companies quickly charge three-figure amounts for monthly tickets. The city of Mainz now wants to use Biontech’s tax returns to file a €365 ticket. But even this cross-financing will cost the consumer three times the cost of a nine-euro ticket.
As a result, many will buy the nine-euro ticket. This will likely start as early as the Pentecost weekend, which is at the beginning of June. “Wow on a nine euro ticket” can be deduced from this as a headline. At least if you’re intellectually simple, don’t ask questions and want to support the government rather than criticize it, in short: if you’re an ARD or a ZDF.
Traffic light representatives are happy to take this address with them through times that will be marked by bad news. There are also good things, with a nine-euro ticket that helps people, you can respond to bad news. In terms of energy economy, the procedure serves its purpose. But then?
Exit from the left
Oscar Lafontaine threw one last time
Lafontaine helped his dishonesty when it came to mining: he did not lose an election as prime minister in Saarland, became a candidate for chancellor, became head of the Social Democratic Party and finally became a “senior minister” in the federal government. The federal state that he should have been responsible for has paid the price. In 1919 and 1945, the Saarland region was so economically important that the Allies separated it from the rest of Germany. Today, it is economically ill so severely that it cannot survive without the help of the rest of Germany – and its dependence continues to grow.
The nine-euro ticket gives consumers a short-term gag. Come cheaply to Lake Constance, Sauerland or to Sylt. This became emblematic of the idea of being able to use a nine-euro ticket to enter the holiday areas of the wealthy. Do you stir up a little bit of social envy, even though you earn yourself well from tax rations? It is terrible in human terms. From an energy economy point of view, it seems to make sense for the fringes of traffic lights.
But then? After that, the same rates as before apply. For those who have to commute every day, this usually means no significant financial savings or at least no significant financial savings at all for taking the bus and train instead of their own car. For this, the flight was extended. My time. If you don’t live near a direct home-to-work connection, you’ll quickly find significant differences. Example: If someone lives in Mainz-Weisanau and works in Trebur, they can drive from house to house in less than half an hour, even in slow traffic. If taking public transport, it will be 2 hours. An hour and a half difference. Twice a day. ten times a week. More than 400 times a year. The traveler then spends more than 20 full days of their year commuting to work if they use public transportation.
Tichy’s Insight – This is how the printed magazine comes to you
Provided that public transportation is on time. But the train is not, at least: according to the Federal Statistics Office, every fourth train in 2021 was delayed by more than six minutes. Keep in mind that this is a statistic based on information from the railways. The FBI justifies regular delays by investing too little in vehicles and safety technology. According to the Federal Statistical Office, long-distance buses were delayed by more than 16 minutes in more than every third instance in 2019. Regional buses and trams are difficult to compare statistically, as the numbers are based on information from regional companies – those responsible for them are often more familiar with energy economics More than honesty.
These delays are difficult for passengers who have to change trains: if they lose their connection due to delays, the actual delay is compounded by the extra time they have to wait when they stop. Not a good time given the convenience and security of the stations.
Does the offer come? It will be expanded. At least that’s what German politicians constantly promise, such as reducing the bureaucratic hurdles to the economy. But there is no progress in either. Although there are funds to expand local public transport. The federal government alone spends double the billion dollars on this every year. But the Federal Court of Auditors recently criticized that the money is not arriving: “The federal government is stuck in this support forest, it lacks a complete overview. This is impairing public transportation,” said SAB Chief Kay Schiller. Rheinische Post.
Public transportation is needed. on the principle. According to the Federal Statistics Office, the number of passengers has decreased during the pandemic. But before that, the number of “one-to-one trips” increased from 131 to 141 trips per year between 2009 and 2018, according to “VDV,” the umbrella organization for carriers. The use of the S-Bahn and trams has increased more than the use of regular buses, which were only fixed before Corona.
Reduce VAT on groceries!
Zero sales tax is the right answer to inflation – and the best social policy
A realist policy that wants to boost local public transport would, on the one hand, expand supply: buy modern, air-conditioned buses, invest in rail safety, put in place additional railroads, and provide incentives so that local public transport is economically largely self-supporting. Then he paid the price for the inevitable deficit. So that the citizen who wants to switch gets adequate offers at reasonable prices. But this is my topic.
Only the policies of 2022 do not think objectively, but rather from the perspective of energy economy. For a system that works, they figure they won’t get any headlines. For a ticket nine euros, yes. They behave towards their fellow citizens like parents who do not trust their children to be able to manage their finances: they give them enough money for necessities, and they arrange the rest with gifts for birthdays, Christmas or if the child is especially good . As for these gifts, they are celebrated even by children.
This model is also suitable for families. But on the one hand, citizens are not underage children. On the other hand, in families, the parents earn money and the children only spend it – and vice versa in the state. So it’s up to the statesmen: Do they want to keep paying the value-added tax, which is exploding at retail prices, and do they want to be tricked with gifts in return? From a country that arbitrarily decides when its citizens will drive cheap cars and when to overprice. Or do these citizens want to come of age and demand a reduction in value-added tax? Or even cancel it? The energy economy is changing. Elections can no longer be won today by demanding that mining be preserved. So no one puts them anymore. And what happened to Oscar Lafontaine is well known.